This blog provides the information on health and disease such as Acne Medicine, Anti-Allergy,Asthma,Beauty Care,Blood Test,Breast Cancer, Cancer News,care Insurance, Cholesterol,Detox,Diabetes,Diet ,diseases,First Aid,Food Combining,Health care,Health Insurance,Health Research, Health Tips,Heart Attack, Hepatitis,Herbal Medicine,HIV, leukimia,Medicine,Neuroscience News,Osteoporosis,Oxygen Therapy,Pain Relievers.Personal care, Pregnancy,Thermometer,Vaccination ,Vitamin,Weight Loss
Friday, November 28, 2008
Healthy Start System Dairy Free [Three 30-Capsule bottles] by Natren
Healthy Start System (Dairy) - Three 30-Capsule bottles ... Natren has combined Digesta-Lac, Bifido Factor and Mega Dophilus to form a comprehensive system for wellness.* Working together, this dynamic trio of Natren products provides all the friendly bacteria you need in one simple system.* MegaDophilus works in the small intestines, BifidoFactor works with the large intestines, and Digesta-Lac aids in overall absorption and digestion.* Healthy Start System is available in dairy powders and dairy free capsules. ... A complete system for digestive problems.* ... Helps maintain normal cholesterol levels.* ... Assists in the absorption of calcium and other vitamins and minerals.* ... Increases nutritional values by producing essential B vitamins.* ... Promotes regularity.* ... Enhances lactose metabolism and digestion of milk products.* ... Produces hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), necessary to inhibit intestinal and vaginal yeast.* ... Neutralizes toxin formation.*
Important Information
Safety Information
Do not give capsules to children under the age of eight (8) to avoid the possibility of choking. ... Do not freeze or expose to moisture, heat, or direct sunlight. ... Do not use if seal is broken. ... Keep refrigerated and dry to maintain potency guarantee.
Indications
Bacterial Immunity,Digestive Balance,Immune System Support
Ingredients
Acidophilus (Mega Dophilus) Lactobacillus 2Billion CFU's (Lactobacillus acidophilus) [Super Strain NAS] Vitamin C 3mg 5% Bifidobacteria (Bifido Factor) Bifidobacteria 2Billion CFU's (Bifidobacterium bifidum) [Super Strain Malyoth] Vitamin C 2mg 3% Lactobacillus (Digesta-Lac) Lactobacillus 2Billion CFU's (L. delbrueckii subspecies bulgaricus) [Lactobacillus bulgaricus super strain LB-51] Vitamin C 3mg 5% Inactive Ingredients: Cellulose Powder Garbanzo Bean (chick-pea)
Directions
For each product in the Healthy Start System: as a dietary supplement, one (1) capsule daily, or more as recommended by your healthcare practitioner with. water, preferably before meals to optimize digestion. Best at least two (2) hours apart from herbs, garlic and prescription drugs for optimal results.
Legal Disclaimer
Statements contained herein have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. These products are not intended to diagnose
Healthy Trinity by Natren W/ Ice Packs - 60 Capsules Probiotics
Natren's Healthy Trinity capsules take probiotics to the next level of effectiveness with a simplified system that is both easy to use and understand. Healthy Trinity capsules contain all three of the most potent super strains of beneficial bacteria- Lactobacillus acidophilus, NAS adhesion super strain, 5 billion cfu per capsule; adult specific Bifidobacterium bifidum, Malyoth super strain, 20 billion cfu per capsule; and Lactobacillus bulgaricus LB - 51 champion transient super strain, 5 billion cfu per capsule.
These amazing super strains may also be found in Natren's other powders or capsules- Megadophilus, Bifido Factor and Digesta - Lac.
This Probiotic is one of the best on the market. I have many allergies and food sensitivities. I have tried a lot of similar products only to end up with stomach aches and other intestinal issues. No problems with this brand. Now that I have been taking it, I am having less problems with foods and all stomach issues then I have had in many years.
I purchased it through Amazon and the shipping company listed did a great job getting this products to me quickly. It was packaged in a stryofoam container with ice packs. I won't hesitate buying through Amazon when I need my next refill.
Monday, November 10, 2008
Cholesterol-Fighting Drugs Show Wider Benefit
By PAM BELLUCK
Published: November 9, 2008
A large new study suggests that millions more people could benefit from taking the cholesterol-lowering drugs known as statins, even if they have low cholesterol, because the drugs can significantly lower their risk of heart attacks, strokes and death.
The study, involving nearly 18,000 people worldwide, tested statin treatment in men 50 and older and in women 60 and older who did not have high cholesterol or histories of heart disease.What they did have was high levels of a protein called high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, or CRP, which indicates inflammation in the body.
The study, presented Sunday at an American Heart Association convention in New Orleans and published online in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that the risk of heart attack was more than cut in half for people who took statins.
Those people were also almost 50 percent less likely to suffer a stroke or need angioplasty or bypass surgery, and they were 20 percent less likely to die during the study. The statin was considered so beneficial that an independent safety monitoring board stopped what was supposed to be a five-year trial last March after less than two years.
Scientists said the research could provide clues on how to address a long-confounding statistic: that half of heart attacks and strokes occur in people without high cholesterol.
“These are findings that are really going to impact the practice of cardiology in the country,” said Dr. Elizabeth G. Nabel, director of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, which was not involved in the research. “It’s at a minimum an extremely important study and has the potential to be a landmark study.”
The study is stirring debate over who should take a blood test to check CRP and under what circumstances someone with high levels of the protein should be given a statin. Because heart disease is a complex illness affected by many risk factors — including smoking, hypertension and being overweight — most researchers said high CRP alone should not justify prescribing statins to people who have never had heart problems.
Some experts cautioned against testing people for the protein unless they had other risk factors, and they said more research was needed to pinpoint the patients for whom the benefit of statins outweighs the risks. On rare occasions, statins have been linked to muscle deterioration or kidney problems, and some patients reported fogginess of memory. Other researchers recommended testing for CRP more frequently and using statins more aggressively.
The study, called Jupiter, is also fueling a debate among scientists about the protein’s importance and inflammation’s role in heart disease.
Dr. Nabel said national panels were likely to revise their official guidelines for doctors to recommend CRP testing and statin therapy for some people not previously considered candidates.
Current practice, she said, is to treat people with high cholesterol with statins and to counsel people at low risk for heart disease about diet and exercise.
“What cardiologists have never known what to do about is the intermediate range” of patients, Dr. Nabel said, who may be overweight, smoke or have hypertension but do not have the most serious red flags of high cholesterol or diabetes. “I think CRP will emerge as a new risk factor added to traditional risk factors.”
The leader of the Jupiter study, Dr. Paul M. Ridker, director of the Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, said expanding statin use could prevent about 250,000 heart attacks, strokes, vascular procedures or cardiac deaths over five years.
Some experts not involved in the study said several million more Americans should probably be taking statins. About 16 million to 20 million do now.
“The Jupiter trial very convincingly used CRP as a way to identify another group of high-risk individuals who would not otherwise have been treated and supports the concept that those people should be treated with a statin,” said Dr. Daniel J. Rader, a heart researcher at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine who was not connected to the study.
Some consumer advocates and doctors raised concerns about the expense of putting relatively healthy patients on statins, which would cost the health system billions of dollars. Name-brand statins can cost $3 a day, but generics are much cheaper. Dr. Ridker said he believed that the widening use of the drugs might prevent costs associated with heart attacks and surgery.
Several experts said that although the research was significant and would affect clinical practice, the study as published did not give enough detail about which patients should now be tested for CRP or given statins.
In an accompanying editorial, Dr. Mark A. Hlatky, a professor of health research at Stanford University, questioned the cost of expanding statin use. He also said that the study, which tested people with levels of the protein over two milligrams per liter, did not indicate whether that level or a higher CRP level should be the threshold for treatment.
Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of the health research group for Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer advocacy group, said the study did not give enough detail about the effect of statins on participants who had only high protein levels, compared with those who also smoked or had a condition called metabolic syndrome.
Some experts questioned whether stopping the trial early had limited the possibility of some more meaningful data. Dr. Ridker said it had not.
He said the published study, as well as unpublished data, indicated that all the statin-takers experienced the same benefit, including those considered “very low risk” because they had no risk factors other than high levels of the protein.
The trial was one of the few to test statins that included many women, Hispanics and blacks, groups that all showed similar benefit from statins.
Like many clinical trials, the Jupiter study was sponsored by a pharmaceutical company, in this case AstraZeneca. It makes the drug in the trial, rosuvastatin, which is sold as Crestor. The most potent statin on the market, Crestor has been criticized by consumer health advocates who say it is more likely to lead to muscle deterioration and kidney problems.
In 2005, the Food and Drug Administration rejected a petition by Public Citizen to ban Crestor, saying its risks were not substantially different from similar drugs.
In the Jupiter study, in which people got either rosuvastatin or a placebo, there was no increase in muscle or kidney problems for those taking the statin. There was a small increase in diabetes.
source:http://www.nytimes.com
Published: November 9, 2008
A large new study suggests that millions more people could benefit from taking the cholesterol-lowering drugs known as statins, even if they have low cholesterol, because the drugs can significantly lower their risk of heart attacks, strokes and death.
The study, involving nearly 18,000 people worldwide, tested statin treatment in men 50 and older and in women 60 and older who did not have high cholesterol or histories of heart disease.What they did have was high levels of a protein called high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, or CRP, which indicates inflammation in the body.
The study, presented Sunday at an American Heart Association convention in New Orleans and published online in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that the risk of heart attack was more than cut in half for people who took statins.
Those people were also almost 50 percent less likely to suffer a stroke or need angioplasty or bypass surgery, and they were 20 percent less likely to die during the study. The statin was considered so beneficial that an independent safety monitoring board stopped what was supposed to be a five-year trial last March after less than two years.
Scientists said the research could provide clues on how to address a long-confounding statistic: that half of heart attacks and strokes occur in people without high cholesterol.
“These are findings that are really going to impact the practice of cardiology in the country,” said Dr. Elizabeth G. Nabel, director of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, which was not involved in the research. “It’s at a minimum an extremely important study and has the potential to be a landmark study.”
The study is stirring debate over who should take a blood test to check CRP and under what circumstances someone with high levels of the protein should be given a statin. Because heart disease is a complex illness affected by many risk factors — including smoking, hypertension and being overweight — most researchers said high CRP alone should not justify prescribing statins to people who have never had heart problems.
Some experts cautioned against testing people for the protein unless they had other risk factors, and they said more research was needed to pinpoint the patients for whom the benefit of statins outweighs the risks. On rare occasions, statins have been linked to muscle deterioration or kidney problems, and some patients reported fogginess of memory. Other researchers recommended testing for CRP more frequently and using statins more aggressively.
The study, called Jupiter, is also fueling a debate among scientists about the protein’s importance and inflammation’s role in heart disease.
Dr. Nabel said national panels were likely to revise their official guidelines for doctors to recommend CRP testing and statin therapy for some people not previously considered candidates.
Current practice, she said, is to treat people with high cholesterol with statins and to counsel people at low risk for heart disease about diet and exercise.
“What cardiologists have never known what to do about is the intermediate range” of patients, Dr. Nabel said, who may be overweight, smoke or have hypertension but do not have the most serious red flags of high cholesterol or diabetes. “I think CRP will emerge as a new risk factor added to traditional risk factors.”
The leader of the Jupiter study, Dr. Paul M. Ridker, director of the Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, said expanding statin use could prevent about 250,000 heart attacks, strokes, vascular procedures or cardiac deaths over five years.
Some experts not involved in the study said several million more Americans should probably be taking statins. About 16 million to 20 million do now.
“The Jupiter trial very convincingly used CRP as a way to identify another group of high-risk individuals who would not otherwise have been treated and supports the concept that those people should be treated with a statin,” said Dr. Daniel J. Rader, a heart researcher at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine who was not connected to the study.
Some consumer advocates and doctors raised concerns about the expense of putting relatively healthy patients on statins, which would cost the health system billions of dollars. Name-brand statins can cost $3 a day, but generics are much cheaper. Dr. Ridker said he believed that the widening use of the drugs might prevent costs associated with heart attacks and surgery.
Several experts said that although the research was significant and would affect clinical practice, the study as published did not give enough detail about which patients should now be tested for CRP or given statins.
In an accompanying editorial, Dr. Mark A. Hlatky, a professor of health research at Stanford University, questioned the cost of expanding statin use. He also said that the study, which tested people with levels of the protein over two milligrams per liter, did not indicate whether that level or a higher CRP level should be the threshold for treatment.
Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of the health research group for Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer advocacy group, said the study did not give enough detail about the effect of statins on participants who had only high protein levels, compared with those who also smoked or had a condition called metabolic syndrome.
Some experts questioned whether stopping the trial early had limited the possibility of some more meaningful data. Dr. Ridker said it had not.
He said the published study, as well as unpublished data, indicated that all the statin-takers experienced the same benefit, including those considered “very low risk” because they had no risk factors other than high levels of the protein.
The trial was one of the few to test statins that included many women, Hispanics and blacks, groups that all showed similar benefit from statins.
Like many clinical trials, the Jupiter study was sponsored by a pharmaceutical company, in this case AstraZeneca. It makes the drug in the trial, rosuvastatin, which is sold as Crestor. The most potent statin on the market, Crestor has been criticized by consumer health advocates who say it is more likely to lead to muscle deterioration and kidney problems.
In 2005, the Food and Drug Administration rejected a petition by Public Citizen to ban Crestor, saying its risks were not substantially different from similar drugs.
In the Jupiter study, in which people got either rosuvastatin or a placebo, there was no increase in muscle or kidney problems for those taking the statin. There was a small increase in diabetes.
source:http://www.nytimes.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
In Indonesia white turmeric is called "Kunir Putih". This spice is believed to be able to treat cancer. The following is the infor...
-
Description Chart your Basal Body Temperature and predict ovulation - your most fertile time of the month for conceiving a baby - with...
-
Indications Restores the skins natural cellular collagen activity - Activates fibroblast cells which create collagen and elastin - Helps...
-
Are you looking for the health information related to healthy heart? Here is the information: By using cutting-edge visual technology to...
-
Features * Composition results for 5 body segments - trunk, left arm, right arm, left leg, right leg * Accurate segmental body compo...